Open Access

N-Substituted indole carbohydrazide derivatives: synthesis and evaluation of their antiplatelet aggregation activity

  • Seyedeh Sara Mirfazli1,
  • Farzad Kobarfard2, 3,
  • Loghman Firoozpour4,
  • Ali Asadipour5,
  • Marjan Esfahanizadeh2,
  • Kimia Tabib2,
  • Abbas Shafiee1 and
  • Alireza Foroumadi1, 5Email author
DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences201422:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-014-0065-6

Received: 9 August 2014

Accepted: 5 September 2014

Published: 20 September 2014

Abstract

Background

Platelet aggregation is one of the most important factors in the development of thrombotic disorders which plays a central role in thrombosis (clot formation). Prophylaxis and treatment of arterial thrombosis are achieved using anti-platelet drugs. In this study, a series of novel substituted indole carbohydrazide was synthesized and evaluated for anti-platelet aggregation activity induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA) and collagen.

Methods

Our synthetic route started from methyl 1H-indole-3-carboxylate (1) and ethyl 1H-indole-2-carboxylate (4) which were reacted with hydrazine monohydrate 99%. The aldol condensation of the later compound with aromatic aldehydes led to the formation of the title compounds. Sixteen indole acylhydrazone derivatives, 3d-m and 6d-i were tested for anti-platelet aggregation activity induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA) and collagen.

Results

Among the synthesized compounds, 6g and 6h with 100% inhibition, proved to be the most potent derivatives of the 2-substituted indole on platelet aggregation induced by AA and collagen, respectively. In 3-substituted indole 3m with 100% inhibition and 3f and 3i caused 97% inhibition on platelet aggregation induced by collagen and AA, respectively.

Conclusion

In this study, compounds 6g, 6h, 3m, 3f and 3i showed better inhibition on platelet aggregation induced by AA and collagen among the title compounds. Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis between the structural parameters of the investigated derivatives and their antiplatelet aggregation activity was performed with various molecular descriptors but, analysis of the physicochemical parameters doesn't show a significant correlation between the observed activities and general molecular parameters of the synthesized derivatives. Although, due to the existence of several receptors on the platelets surface which are responsible for controlling the platelet aggregation, the investigated compounds in the present study may exert their activities through binding to more than one of these receptors and therefore no straight forward SAR could be obtained for them.

Keywords

Anti-platelet aggregationIndoleN-acylhydrazone

Background

Cardiovascular diseases are responsible for the largest number of death and disability worldwide. Platelet adhesion and aggregation are key events in hemostasis and thrombosis which cause disrupted atherosclerotic plaques that is the initiator of most thrombotic disorders including heart attacks and strokes [1]-[3]. Platelets play the major role in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic disorders and activation of the platelets by complex biochemical pathways and mediators is the primary step in this process [4],[5]. Endogenous agonists such as arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP) that acts on purinergic receptors on the platelet-known as P2Y receptors, thromboxane A2 (TxA2), thrombin, platelet activating factor (PAF), epinephrine (EPN) and collagen are among potent agonists that initiate the formation of stable platelet aggregates [6]-[8].

Clinical evidence has clearly proven that antiplatelet aggregation agents are useful for preventing thrombotic disorders. On the other hand, there are still some serious limitations to currently use agents which include weak inhibition of platelet function (aspirin), slow onset of action (clopidogrel), variable response to treatment among patients and high incidence of bleeding events which is dose dependent in both aspirin and clopidogrel drug therapy [9]. Considering the current situation, pursuit of finding novel scaffolds as new antiplatelet aggregation drugs which are more effective and safer with fewer side effects is very important [10].

A novel group of heterocyclic acylhydrazone derivatives with antiplatelet aggregation activity on rabbit platelet-rich plasma have been reported [11],[12]. Furthermore, the N-acylhydrazone (NAH) moiety, have shown a series of biological activities such as analgesic, anti-inflammatory [13]-[20], protozoa proteases inhibition [21], HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dimmer destabilization [22], antibiotic and antifungal activities [23], and cardiovascular actions [24]-[28].

Indole ring is another structural moiety which has been reported to have antiplatelet aggregation activity [29]. Considering this background, a diverse group of derivatives have been synthesized in this study by molecular hybridization between indole and hydrazone moieties, to find the structure-antiplatelet activity relationship of the derivatives. The schematic structural backbone for these compounds which contain both indole and N-acylhydrazone is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the general hydrazone structural backbone with antiplatelet activity.

Chemistry

The synthetic procedure planned to obtain the desired indole N-acylhydrazone derivatives, is shown in Scheme 1. The key intermediates were obtained by hydrazinolysis of 1 and 4 in 96% and 91% yield, respectively, using hydrazine monohydrate 99% in ethanol. The final indole N-acylhydrazone derivatives were obtained by condensing the hydrazide intermediates with the proper aromatic aldehydes (ArCHO) in water and glacial acetic acid as the solvent, in good yields.
Scheme 1

The synthesis pathway for indole N -acylhydrazones. Reagents and reaction condition: a) Hydrazine monohydrate 99% (NH2NH2), Ethanol (a few drop), reflux at 80°C, 3 h b) ArCHO, H2O, Glacial acetic acid (a few drop), reflux at 100°C, 3 h.

Material and methods

General

All commercial solvents, chemicals and reagents were purchased from either Merck or Sigma-Aldrich with the highest purity and used without further purification. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 MHz spectrometers (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) and pick positions are illustrated in parts per million (δ) in DMSO-d 6 solution and tetramethylsilane (0.05% v/v) as internal standard and coupling constant values (J) are given in Hertz. Signal multiplicities are reported by: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quadruplet), m (multiplet) and br (broad signal). For NMR spectral data assignments, the atom numbering of compounds is depicted in Table 1. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with Merck silica gel plates and visualized with UV irradiation (254 nm) or iodine. Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were obtained using Agilent 6410 Triple Quad. LC/MS. Melting points were obtained by an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were taken by a Perkin-Elmer 843 spectrometer with KBr as diluent. The elemental analysis for C, H and N was performed by a Costech model 4010 and the percentage values agreed with the proposed structures within ±0.4% of the theoretical values. All described products showed 1H NMR spectra according to the assigned structures. The physicochemical parameters including Clog P value, surface area, molecular volume, refractivity and polarizability were calculated by Hyperchem 8.0 software.
Table 1

Effect of 3-substituted indole (3d-m) and 2-substituted indole (6d-i) derivatives at 1 mM concentration on in-vitro platelet aggregation induced by AA, ADP and collagen

Derivative

Structure

AA

ADP

Collagen

Inhibition (%)b

3d

 

30.1 ± 3

31 ± 1.5

24.5 ± 2.1

3e

 

94 ± 5

20 ± 1.3

80 ± 4.3

3f

 

97 ± 4.9

41.5 ± 2.1

73.6 ± 2.9

3 g

 

94 ± 2.5

46 ± 2.5

65.6 ± 3.1

3h

 

95 ± 3.9

21.3 ± 1

44.6 ± 2.1

3i

 

97 ± 5.1

47.5 ± 1.2

74 ± 3.9

3j

 

96 ± 4.6

42.8 ± 0.9

81 ± 1.9

3 k

 

93 ± 1.9

55 ± 1.3

91 ± 2.7

3 l

 

94 ± 3

53 ± 2.1

91 ± 0.9

3 m

 

94 ± 2.8

35 ± 1.2

100 ± 2.0

6d

 

96 ± 4.1

31.4 ± 1.4

61.6 ± 3.2

6e

 

35 ± 2.5

66.8 ± 1.1

8 ± 0.9

6f

 

94.5 ± 3.1

25.9 ± 0.6

61 ± 3

6 g

 

100 ± 3.8

26.8 ± 1

27.3 ± 1.2

6 h

 

96 ± 2.9

24 ± 0.8

100 ± 3.4

6i

 

98 ± 1.4

51 ± 1.3

80 ± 2.5

Indomethacin a

 

100 ± 4.3

42 ± 1.1

100 ± 2.8

Aspirin a

 

100 ± 2.8

21 ± 0.6

100 ± 3.1

aAspirin and Indomethacin were used as a positive control.

bValues are presented as mean ± S.E. of three separate determination.

General procedure for the preparation of carbohydrazides (2, 5)

Compounds (1 or 4) (2.86 mmol) was added to a solution of hydrazine monohydrate 99% (2.14 mL; 2.18 g; 43.6 mmol) in ethanol (0.5 mL) and the reaction mixture was stirred at about 80°C temperature, for 2 h. TLC indicated the end of reaction. The mixture was cooled by addition of a water/ice mixture. The solid was filtered in excellent yield (Scheme 1) [30]-[32].

1H- indole-3-carbohydrazide (2) and 1H- indole-2-carbohydrazide (5) were prepared according to a literature method [30]-[32].

General procedure for the preparation of N-acylhydrazone derivatives

Equimolar amount of appropriate aromatic aldehyde was added to a solution of hydrazide compound (2 or 5) in 10 mL of water, in presence of catalytic amount of glacial acetic acid (0.4 mL). Reaction mixture was heated under reflux with stirring for about 2 h and poured into ice/water mixture. The precipitate was filtered and washed with cold water (Scheme 1).

N'-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3i), N'-(3-hydroxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3j), N'-benzylidene-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3 m), N'-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide (6e), N'-(2-methoxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide (6f) and N'-benzylidene-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide (6i) were prepared according to a literature method [30]-[32].

N'-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3d)

Yield: 92%, mp 256- 259°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3365 (ν OH), 3283, 3041, 2927, 1660, 1614, 1596, 1577, 1564. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.79 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.71 (bs, 1H, Indole NH), 11.51 (bs, 1H, OH), 8.52 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─) 8.21 (bs, 1H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H2), 8.20 (d, 1H, J = 7.85 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5 ,H4), 7.52 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4), 7.29 (td, 1H, J = 7.0, 1.40 Hz, Indole H7), 7.21 (td, 1H, J=7.4, 1.45 Hz, Indole H5), 7.17 (td, 1H, J=7.0, 1.45 Hz, Indole H6), 6.95- 6.91 (m, 2H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H3, H5), ESI-Mass m/z: 280 [M + H]+, 302 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H13N3O2: C, 68.81; H, 4.69; N, 15.05. Found: C, 68.64; H, 4.83; N, 14.92.

N'-(2-nitrobenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3e)

Yield: 96%, mp 272- 274°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3282, 3218, 3143, 3089, 1635, 1595, 1564, 1540 and 1353 (NO2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.83 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.81 (s, 1H, Indole NH), 8.72 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H2), 8.28 (bs, 1H, ─N═CH─), 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, Indole H4), 8.16 (d, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6), 8.08 (dd, 1H, J = 7.20, 1.0 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H3), 7.83 (t, 1H, J=7.5 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H5), 7.66 (td, 1H, J = 7.6, 1.35 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4), 7.49 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz, Indole H7), 7.23-7.16 (m, 2H, Indole H5, H6), ESI-Mass m/z: 309 [M + H]+, 331 [M + Na]+, 347 [M + K]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12N4O3: C, 62.33; H, 3.92; N, 18.17. Found: C, 62.58; H, 4.08; N, 18.32.

N'-(2-methoxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3f)

Yield: 69%, mp 229- 231°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3300- 3200 (ν NH), 3112, 3076, 1622, 1601, 1578, 1540; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.73 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.41 (s, 1H, Indole-NH), 8.65 (bs, 1H, Indole H2 ), 8.22 (bs, 2H, Indole H4, ─N═CH─), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 6.70 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6), 7.48 (d, 1H, J = 7. 85 Hz, Indole H7), 7.41 (td, 1H, J=7.3, 1.35 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4), 7.20 (t, 1H, J=7.0 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H5), 7.15 (t, 1H, J=7.4 Hz, Indole H5), 7.12 (d, 1H, J=8.3 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H3), 7.04 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, Indole H6), 3.89 (s, 3H, ─OCH3); ESI-Mass m/z: 294 [M + H]+, 316 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C17H15N3O2: C, 69.61; H, 5.15; N, 14.33. Found: C, 69.46; H, 5.33; N, 14.12.

N'-(3-chlorobenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3 g)

Yield: 78%, mp 288- 291°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3545, 3390, 3320, 3263, 3068, 1635, 1580, 1558,1548; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.78 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.50 (s, 1H, Indole-NH), 8.27 (bs, 1H, ─N═CH─), 8.21 (s, 1H, Indole H2), 8.20 (s, 1H, Indole H4), 7.78 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H2), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6), 7.51- 7.47 (m, 3H, Indole H7, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4, H5), 7.22- 7.15 (m, 2H, Indole H5, H6); ESI-Mass m/z: 298 [M + H]+, 320 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12ClN3O: C, 64.54; H, 4.06; N, 11.91. Found: C, 64.19; H, 4.24; N, 11.76.

N'-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3 h)

Yield: 74%, mp 265- 267°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3394, 3240, 3060, 1637, 1603, 1555, 1536; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.76 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.45 (s, 1H, Indole-NH), 8.35- 8.21 (m, 3H, ─N═CH─, Indole H2, H4), 7.75 (d, 2H, J=8.5 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H2, H6), 7.53 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H3, H5), 7.49 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz, Indole H7), 7.22- 7.15 (m, 2H, Indole H5, H6); ESI-Mass m/z: 298 [M + H]+, 320 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12ClN3O: C, 64.54; H, 4.06; N, 11.91. Found: C, 64.43; H, 3.91; N, 12.16.

N'-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3 k)

Yield: 90%, mp 239- 240°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3299- 3073 (ν NH), 3032, 2956, 1636, 1614, 1586, 1555. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.77 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.50 (bs, 1H, Indole NH), 8.55 (bs, 1H, ─N═CH─), 8.22 (d, 1H, J=7.5 Hz, Indole H4), 7.94 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4), 7.50- 7.45 (m, 3H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6, Indole H2, H7), 7.33- 7.29 (m, 2H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H3, H5), 7.21 (td, 1H, J = 6.5, 1.3 Hz, Indole H5), 7.16 (td, 1H, J=6.5, 1.3 Hz, Indole H6); ESI-Mass m/z: 282 [M + H]+, 304 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12FN3O: C, 68.32; H, 4.30; N, 14.94. Found: C, 68.64; H, 4.13; N, 14.62.

N'-(3-fluorobenzylidene)-1H-indole-3-carbohydrazide (3 l)

Yield: 87%, mp 278- 281°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3319- 3200 (ν NH), 3139, 3089, 1647, 1591, 1558, 1500. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.76 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.50 (bs, 1H, Indole NH), 8.34- 8.27 (m, 3H, ─N═CH─, Indole H4, H2), 7.57- 7.48 (m, 4H, ─N═CH─C6H5 ,H2, H5, H6, Indole, H7), 7.28- 7.24 (m, 1H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4), 7.21 (td, 1H, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, Indole H5), 7.16 (td, 1H, J=6.8, 1.2 Hz, Indole H6); ESI-Mass m/z: 282 [M + H]+, 304 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12FN3O: C, 68.32; H, 4.30; N, 14.94. Found: C, 68.14; H, 4.03; N, 15.02.

N'-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide (6d)

Yield: 98%, mp 186- 188°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3450, 3227, 3038, 2922, 1643, 1621, 1612, 1593, and 1564. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.03 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.85 (s, 1H, Indole NH), 8.71 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─), 7.98 (t, 1H, J=7.3 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5 ,H4), 7.70 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5,H6), 7.52- 7.47 (m, 2H, Indole H4, H7), 7.35- 7.32 (m, 2H, Indole H5, H6), 7.24 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H3), 7.08 (t, 1H, J=7.4 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H5); ESI-Mass m/z: 282 [M + H]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12FN3O: C, 68.32; H, 4.30; N, 14.94. Found: C, 68.14; H, 4.63; N, 15.12.

N'-(3-fluorobenzylidene)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide (6 g)

Yield: 88%, mp 171- 173°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3448, 3313, 3264, 3126, 3071, 1629, 1597, 1577, 1529; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.02 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.84 (s, 1H, Indole NH), 8.47 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─), 7.70 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5 ,H2),7.61 (d, 1H, J=7.3 Hz, Indole H7), 7.58- 7.52 (m, 2H, ─N═CH─C6H5 H5, Indole, H4), 7.48 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6), 7.34 (s, 1H, Indole H3), 7.30 (t, 1H, J=8.5 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H6), 7.24 (t, 1H, J=7.5 Hz, Indole H6), 7.08 (t, 1H, J=7.5 Hz, Indole H5); ESI-Mass m/z: 282 [M + H]+, 304 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H12FN3O: C, 68.32; H, 4.30; N, 14.94. Found: C, 68.01; H, 4.33; N, 14.62.

N'-(3-hydroxybenzylidene)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide (6 h)

Yield: 89%, mp 278- 281°C. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3412 (ν OH), 3227, 3185, 3048, 2924, 1624, 1599, 1583, 1564, 1507; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.05 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.84 (bs, 2H, Indole NH, OH), 8.44 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─), 7.82 (s, 1H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H2), 7.74- 7.68 (m, 2H, Indole H4, H7), 7.53- 7.51 (m, 2H, ─N═CH─C6H5, H5, H6), 7.47 (d, 1H, J=8.3 Hz, ─N═CH─C6H5, H4), 7.34 (s, 1H, Indole H3), 7.24 (t, 1H, J=7.1 Hz, Indole H6), 7.08 (t, 1H, J=7.1 Hz, Indole H5); ESI-Mass m/z: 280 [M + H]+, 302 [M + Na]+; Anal. Calcd. for C16H13N3O2: C, 68.81; H, 4.69; N, 15.05. Found: C, 69.04; H, 4.41; N, 14.92.

Biological assay

In vitro evaluation of anti-platelet aggregation activity

Human plasma used to measure the derivatives anti-platelet aggregation activity. Fresh blood was obtained from healthy volunteer with negative history of drug consumption from 15 days prior to the test. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained from citrated whole blood (9:1 by volume) which centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 8 min. The remained layer was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min and the upper layer; PPP (Platelet poor plasma) was collected as the blank. The platelet count was adjusted to 250,000 plts/mL by diluting PRP with appropriate amount of PPP. To the PRP samples, test compounds previously dissolved in DMSO (at 0.05% final concentration) were added and samples were incubated for 5 min at 37°C. Then ADP (5μM), collagen (1.25 mg/mL) or AA (1.25 mg/mL) was added and platelet shape change and aggregation were monitored for 5 min. DMSO (0.5% v/v) was used as negative control and aspirin and indomethacin were applied as standard drugs. The extent of platelet aggregation was calculated by the following formula:
Inhibition % = 1 - D / S * 100
(1)
D = platelet aggregation in the presence of test compoundsS = platelet aggregation in the presence of solvent.

The platelet aggregation inhibitory activity was expressed as percent inhibition by comparison with that measured for the vehicle (DMSO) alone and IC50 values were obtained from log (concentration) − inhibition (%) diagram and was defined as the concentration of the test compound that inhibits the platelet aggregation by 50%. Data were presented as mean±S.E.M. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. IC50values and inhibition data were analyzed with prism software.

Consent

The study was approved in the Institute Review Board with code number 93-6-10:1-1. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Results

The synthetic pathway is disclosed in Scheme 1. Final desired derivatives were prepared by a two-step procedure. The structures were confirmed by spectroscopic techniques including IR, Mass and 1H NMR. Molecular mass of all the derivatives was determined by Electron-spray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) as M + 1 and/or M + 23 relating to hydrogen and sodium adducts of the intact molecules, respectively. All the synthesized compounds were evaluated for their ability to inhibit platelet aggregation of human platelet-rich plasma (PRP) induced by AA, ADP and collagen as potent aggregation inducers, and using indomethacin and aspirin were applied as standard drugs. The results of in-vitro antiplatelet aggregation activity for the title compounds were summarized in Table 1. All the derivatives were initially tested at 1 mM.

The physicochemical parameters of the derivatives were calculated and are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

General molecular parameters of the synthesized compounds

Compound

Clog P

Ra

Pb

Vc

SAd

     

Approx.

Grid

3d

2.92

86.69

30.1

771.23

374.67

469.41

3e

-0.15

92.78

32.03

809.38

404.94

487.59

3f

3.35

88.16

30.83

781.07

373.02

472.72

3g

2.72

90.56

31.99

854.73

356.93

517.77

3h

3.85

91.28

32.12

807.06

402.79

488.39

3i

3.28

86.69

30.1

772.67

378.22

470.61

3j

2.72

88.16

30.83

784.59

381.64

474.45

3k

2.72

88.16

30.83

783.92

379.99

474.45

3l

3.85

91.28

32.12

807.9

403.8

488.87

3m

3.14

86.56

30.19

764.21

367.69

464.55

6d

3.26

87.96

30.1

775.75

381.25

476.6

6e

3.69

89.44

30.83

787.22

379.72

479.81

6f

3.06

94.21

32.66

844.8

422.2

515.34

6g

3.62

87.96

30.1

778.08

384.8

477.59

6h

3.06

89.44

30.83

791.05

387

482.43

6i

3.48

87.83

30.19

772.17

374

474.2

aRefractivity.

bPolarizability.

cMolecular volume.

dSurface area.

Discussion

Chemistry

All derivatives of 3-substituted indole and 2-substituted indole were obtained by the reaction of 2 and 5 with the proper aldehydes. Synthesis of Schiff bases were performed in ethanol with a few drops of glacial acetic acid. This reaction in the majority of the cases was straight forward; however, the products were soluble in ethanol and their separation was difficult. Therefore in another effort, the solvent was changed to water, a few drops of glacial acetic acid was added to the reaction mixture and heated for 10 min. After completion of reaction, the products were obtained in excellent yields.

In the 1H NMR spectra of these compounds the existence of two singlet at 11.00 to 12.00 ppm was assigned to hydrazide NH and indole NH. Also, singlet signal at 8.20-8.80 ppm was assigned to H─C = N. The 1H NMR and ESI-mass data of compounds approved the exact structures.

Antiplatelet aggregation activity

Platelet activation and thrombus formation are major causes of cardiovascular diseases and thrombosis. Thus, antiplatelet therapy is a useful way to prevent or treat these diseases; these diseases; thus, antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, ticlopidine and dipyridamole have been clinically used for thrombus-related diseases [9]. However, the side effects of mentioned agents frequently have been reported and a new group of compounds with greater efficacy and safety are desired. Therefore, in the present study, the inhibitory effects of synthesized compounds on platelet aggregation were evaluated by turbidimetric method reported by Born and Cross [33] using APACT 4004 aggregometer. The baseline value was set using PRP and maximal transmission using PPP. Compounds 3d-m and 6d-i were tested for anti-platelet aggregation activity induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA) and collagen using indomethacin and aspirin as standards.

Interestingly, most of the tested derivatives selectively inhibited platelet aggregation induced by AA and collagen with satisfactory percent inhibition values. According to the literature [15]; herein, antiplatelet aggregation activity of N-acylhydrazones is probably related to modulation of AA cascade enzymes.

Among the synthesized indole-2-carbaldehyde derivatives compound 6g exhibited 100% inhibition of platelet aggregation at 1 mM when AA was used as agonist while this compound has no significant inhibitory activity against ADP and collagen induced platelet aggregation. Comparing the results obtained for indole derivatives, compounds 3m and 6h showed the best antiplatelet aggregation effect which induced by collagen. On the other hand, effects of the synthesized compounds on the platelet aggregation induced by ADP shows another pattern: all the compounds caused no significant inhibition on platelet aggregation except 6e which showed 66.7% inhibition.

The IC50 values were calculated for more potent compounds (3f, 3i, 3k, 3l, 3m, 6d, 6g, 6h and 6i) for the inhibition of AA and collagen-induced aggregation which are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

IC 50 values for the antiplatelet aggregation activity induced by collagen and AA a

Compound

Aryl

IC50(μM)b

AA

Collagen

3f

2-methoxyphenyl

310±8.1

121.5±3.1

3i

4-hydroxyphenyl

290±5.3

188±2.8

3k

2-fluorophenyl

179±2.4

122±1.6

3l

3-fluorophenyl

321±3.9

120±4.0

3m

phenyl

182±5.2

21±0.9

6d

2-fluorophenyl

286±1.5

720±9.1

6g

3-fuorophenyl

140±4.3

>1000

6h

3-hydroxyphenyl

200±2.0

190±3.2

6i

phenyl

94±1.9

134±4.1

Indomethacin

 

3±0.2

1.2±0.1

Aspirin

 

30.3±2.6

9.7±0.6

aData related to compounds 3 and 6 as shown in Scheme 1.

bIC50 values represent mean ± S.E. of triplicate measurements from one of three independent experiments.

However, the obtained results were compared with those reported by Kobarfard et al. on antiplatelet aggregation effect of some indole derivatives [4]. It was found that the insertion of acyl group to indole hydrazone moiety cannot improve platelet aggregation inhibitory activity.

In order to investigate the possible relationship between the structural parameters of the investigated derivatives and their antiplatelet aggregation activity, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis was performed with various molecular descriptors. The calculated octanol-water partition coefficient (Clog P) has been considered as descriptor for the hydrophobic effect. The steric effect has been described by means of the surface area (SA: approx and grid) and molecular volume (V) refractivity (R) and polarizability (P) have been used as descriptors for both volume and electronic state (London dispersive forces) properties of the molecules. For each descriptor, the best multilinear regression equation was obtained. The calculated physicochemical parameters of the derivatives are listed in Table 2. Analysis of the physicochemical parameters doesn't show a significant correlation between the observed activities and general molecular parameters of the synthesized derivatives.

Conclusion

In summary, we have synthesized sixteen N-acylhydrazone derivatives (3d-m and 6d-i) and evaluated their antiplatelet aggregation activity against collagen, ADP and AA as the aggregation inducers. Compounds 3e, 3g, 3h, 3i, 3j, 3k, 3l, 3m, 6d, 6f, 6g, 6h and 6i showed significant antiplatelet aggregation (>90%) when arachidonic acid was used as the inducer. While, 3l, 3k, 3m and 6h exhibited best (>90%) platelet aggregation inhibition induced by collagen among other compounds.

Failure to extract a clear correlation between activities and general molecular parameters of the synthesized compounds could be related to the existence of several receptors on the platelets surface which are responsible for controlling platelet aggregation. Platelets are activated by variety of metabolic pathways. The mechanism of platelet aggregation pathway is very complex and involves multiple components and it can be controlled by heterogeneous group of endogenous compounds such as ADP, ATP, collagen, tryptophan, epinephrine, thromboxane A2 and calcium. Each can independently and together begin the process leading to platelet aggregation. These compounds on platelets have specific receptors and the investigated compounds in the present study may exert their activities through binding to more than one of these receptors and therefore no straight forward SAR could be obtained. The findings of this study will be helpful for the development of new antiplatelet compounds providing some directions in the area of antiplatelet drug discovery.

Authors' contributions

SSM: Synthesis of the title compounds and collaboration in the antiplatelet aggregation test. FK: Design of target compounds and supervision of the synthetic and pharmacological parts. LF: Collaboration in computational study. AA: collaboration in the synthetic part. ME: Performed the antiplatelet aggregation test. KT: collaborated in the antiplatelet aggregation test and identifying the structures of target compounds. AS: Design of target compounds and supervision of the synthetic part. AF: Design of target compounds and supervision of the synthetic part. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for financial support from the Research Council of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(2)
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
(3)
Phytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
(4)
Drug Design and Development Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(5)
Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B: Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control. 2011, [], [http://www.world-heart-federation.org/publications/books/global-atlas-on-cvd-prevention-and-control/]
  2. Reddy MV, Tsai WJ, Qian K, Lee KH, Wu TS: Structure-activity relationships of chalcone analogs as potential inhibitors of ADP- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011, 19: 7711-7719. 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brito FCF, Kummerle AE, Lugnier C, Fraga CAM, Barreiro EJ, Miranda ALP: Novel thienylacylhydrazone derivatives inhibit platelet aggregation through cyclic nucleotides modulation and thromboxane A2synthesis inhibition. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010, 638: 5-12. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mashayekhi V, Hajmohammad Ebrahim Tehrani K, Amidi S, Kobarfard F: Synthesis of novel indole hydrazone derivatives and evaluation of their antiplatelet aggregation activity. Chem Pharm Bull. 2013, 61: 144-150. 10.1248/cpb.c12-00597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DeCandia M, Liantonio F, Carotti A, De Cristofaro R, Altomare C: Fluorinated benzyloxyphenyl piperidine-4-carboxamides with dual function against thrombosis: inhibitors of factor Xa and platelet aggregation. J Med Chem. 2009, 52: 1018-1028. 10.1021/jm801141f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Maree AO, Fitzgerald DJ: Variable platelet response to aspirin and clopidogrel in atherothrombotic disease. Circulation. 2007, 115: 2196-2207. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Meadows TA, Bhatt DL: Clinical aspects of platelet inhibitors and thrombus formation. Circ Res. 2007, 100: 1261-1275. 10.1161/01.RES.0000264509.36234.51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fathiazad F, Matlobi A, Khorrami A, Hamedeyazdan S, Soraya H, Hammami M, Maleki-Dizaji N, Garjani A: Phytochemical screening and evaluation of cardioprotective activity of ethanolic extract of Ocimum basilicum L. (basil) against isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction in rats. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2012, 20: 87-10.1186/2008-2231-20-87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Eskandariyan Z, Esfahanizadeh M, Haj Mohammad Ebrahim Tehrani K, Mashayekhi V, Kobarfard F: Synthesis of thioether derivatives of quinazoline-4-one-2-thione and evaluation of their antiplatelet aggregation activity. Arch Pharm Res. 2013, 37: 332-339. 10.1007/s12272-013-0192-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Siwek A, Stączek P, Stefańska J: Synthesis and structure activity relationship studies of 4-arylthiosemicarbazides as topoisomerase IV inhibitors with Gram-positive antibacterial activity. search for molecular basis of antibacterial activity of thiosemicarbazides. Eur J Med Chem. 2011, 46: 5717-5726. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.09.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraga AGM, Rodrigues CR, de Miranda ALP, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM: Synthesis and evaluation of novel heterotricyclic acylhydrazones derivatives, designed as PAF antagonist candidates. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000, 11: 285-290. 10.1016/S0928-0987(00)00102-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunha AC, Figueiredo JM, Tributino JLM, Miranda ALP, Castro HC, Zingali RB, Fraga CAM, de Souza MCBV, Ferreira VF, Barreiro EJ: Antiplatelet properties of novelN-substituted-phenyl-1,2,3-triazole-4-acylhydrazone derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2003, 11: 2051-2059. 10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00055-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunha AC, Tributino JLM, Miranda ALP, Fraga CAM, Barreiro EJ: Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel antinociceptive N-substituted-phenylimidazolyl- 4-acylhydrazone derivatives. II Farmaco. 2002, 57: 999-1007. 10.1016/S0014-827X(02)01286-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lima PC, Lima LM, da Silva KC, Le’da PH, de Miranda AL, Fraga CAM, Barreiro EJ: Synthesis and analgesic activity of novelN-acylarylhydrazones and isosters, derived from natural safrole. Eur J Med Chem. 2000, 35: 187-203. 10.1016/S0223-5234(00)00120-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Silva GA, Costa LMM, Brito FCF, Miranda ALP, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM: New class of potent antinociceptive and antiplatelet 10H-phenothiazine-1-acylhydrazone derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004, 12: 3149-3158. 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bezerra-Neto HJC, Lacerda DI, Miranda ALP, Alves HM, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM: Design and synthesis of 3,4-methylenedioxy-6-nitrophenoxyacetylhydrazone derivatives obtained from natural safrole: new lead-agents with analgesic and antipyretic properties. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006, 14: 7924-7935. 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.07.046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Duarte CD, Tributino JLM, Lacerda DI, Martins MV, Alexandre-Moreira MS, Dutra F, Bechara EJH, De-Paula FS, Goulart MOF, Ferreira J, Calixto JB, Nunes MP, Bertho AL, Miranda ALP, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM: Synthesis, pharmacological evaluation and electrochemical studies of novel 6-nitro-3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl-N-acylhydrazone derivatives: discovery of LASSBio-881, a new ligand of cannabinoid receptors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007, 15: 2421-2433. 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.01.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lima LM, Frattani FS, dos Santos JL, Castro HC, Fraga CAM, Zingali RB, Barreiro EJ: Synthesis and anti-platelet activity of novel arylsulfonateacylhydrazone derivatives, designed as antithrombotic candidates. Eur J Med Chem. 2008, 43: 348-356. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2007.03.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tributino JLM, Duarte CD, Corrêa RS, Dorigetto AC, Ellena J, Romeiro NC, Castro NG, Miranda ALP, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM: Novel 6-methanesulfonamide- 3,4-methylenedioxy-phenyl- N-acylhydrazones: orally effective anti-inflammatory drug candidates. Biorg Med Chem. 2009, 17: 1125-1131. 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.12.045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Maia RC, Silva LL, Mazzeu EF, Fumian MM, de Rezende CM, Doriguetto AC, Corrêa RS, Miranda ALP, Barreiro EJ, Fraga MCA: Synthesis and analgesic profile of conformationally constrained N-acylhydrazone analogues: Discovery of novel N-arylideneamino quinazolin-4(3H)-one compounds derived from natural safrole. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009, 17: 6517-6525. 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen R, Li X, Gong B, Selzer PM, Li Z, Davidson E, Kurzban G, Miller RE, Nuzum EO, McKerrow JH, Fletterick RJ, Gillmor SA, Craik CS, Kuntz ID, Cohen FE, Kenyon GL: Structure-based design of parasitic protease inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 1996, 4: 1421-1427. 10.1016/0968-0896(96)00136-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sluis-Cremer N, Arion D, Parniak MA: Destabilization of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dimer upon interaction with N-acyl hydrazone inhibitors. Mol Pharmacol. 2002, 62: 398-405. 10.1124/mol.62.2.398.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dimmock JR, Baker GB, Taylor WG: Arylhydrazones. Part II. The ultraviolet spectroscopy and antimicrobial evaluation of some substituted aroylhydrazones. Can J Pharm Sci. 1972, 7: 100-103.Google Scholar
  24. Sudo RT, Zapata-Sudo G, Barreiro EJ: The new compound, LASSBio 294, increases the contractility of intact and saponin-skinned cardiac muscle from Wistar rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2001, 134: 603-613. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704291.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonzalez-Serratos H, Chang R, Pereira EF, Castro NG, Aracava Y, Melo PA, Lima PC, Fraga CAM, Barreiro EJ, Albuquerque EX: A novel thienylhydrazone, (2- thienylidene) 3,4-methylenedioxybenzoylhydrazine, increases inotropism and decreases fatigue of skeletal muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001, 229: 558-566.Google Scholar
  26. Silva CLM, Noe LF, Barreiro EJ: Cyclic GMP-dependent vasodilatory properties of LASSBio 294 in rat aorta. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 135: 293-298. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704473.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zapata-Sudo G, Sudo RT, Maronas PA, Silva GL, Moreira OR, Aguiar MI, Barreiro EJ: Thienylhydrazone derivative increases sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+release in mammalian skeletal muscle. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003, 470: 79-85. 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01757-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Silva AG, Zapata-Sudo G, Kummerle AE, Fraga CAM, Barreiro EJ, Sudo RT: Synthesis and vasodilatory activity of newN-acylhydrazone derivatives, designed as LASSBio-294 analogues. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005, 13: 3431-3437. 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.03.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Park MK, Rhee YH, Lee HJ, Lee EO, Kim KH, Park MJ, Jeon BH, Shim BS, Jung CH, Choi SH, Ahn KS, Kim SH: Antiplatelet and antithrombotic activity of indole-3-carbinol in vitro and in vivo. Phytother Res. 2008, 22: 58-64. 10.1002/ptr.2260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Alemany A, Bernabé M, Elorriaga C, Fernández AE, Lora-Tamayo M, Nieto O: Patent; Patron, Invest. Cie. Tech. Bull Soc Chim Fr. 1966, 8: 2486-2497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bao XP, Zheng PC, Liu Y, Tan Z, Zhou YH, Song BA: Salicylaldehyde-indole-2-acylhydrazone: a simple, colorimetric and absorption ratiometric chemosensor for acetate ion. Supramol Chem. 2013, 25: 246-253. 10.1080/10610278.2012.758368.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wareth A, Sarhan AO: On the synthesis and reactions of indole-2-carboxylic acid hydrazide. Monatsh Chem. 2001, 132: 753-763. 10.1007/s007060170091.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Born GVR: Aggregation of blood platelets by adenosine diphosphate and its reversal. Nature. 1962, 194: 927-929. 10.1038/194927b0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mirfazli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement